Is There a Language of Tai Chi?

is there a language of tai chi.jpgAs I listen to others talk about tai chi, about chi kung, about martial styles, about anything, I find we are often saying the same thing.  This morning I was wondering why we often sound as if we’re speaking different languages.  Sometimes it even sounds as though some of us are speaking in tongues.

Chi (qi) energy is something spiritual in nature.  Yet if you listen to the meta-physicians walking among us, everything is spiritual in nature.  If that’s the case, why can we easily communicate about things physical while finding it difficult to talk about things non-physical?  I am of two minds on this topic: two parallel minds, two minds that do not intersect, two co-existing minds.  How very, very spiritual.  ;-)

One mind says we can understand anything, or just about anything that’s important to us.  The problems arise from our differing vocabularies.  At times we misuse words, other times we use alternate but valid meanings, and other times still we use colloquial meanings that are understood within our own circles.  No wonder we have such a hard time agreeing with one another.  We can be saying the same thing, using different words, and arguing with one another about who’s right.

The other mind says, we only think we can understand some things because we talk about them often.  We believe we can easily communicate about things physical, because we interact with the physical on a daily basis.  We listen as newscasters, or read as inane bloggers pontificate about any and all subjects in our physical universe.  We receive instructions from our bosses, or give instructions to our subordinates, and the instructions are usually followed closely enough that we seem to be in agreement.  When we talk of things spiritual however, most of us have limited vocabularies.  Our limited vocabularies let us know we don’t understand, so we don’t even try to understand that which cannot be understood.

I don’t have a definitive answer here, only more questions.  So, I thought I’d throw this out and see if it sparks a conversation.  As the infamous, ancient, and now contemporary Master of Duhism, Bob Tzu, recently posted on his blog:

“The real Truth cannot be spoken.  Why?  Don’t ask me, I can’t talk about it.”

Your thoughts?

John

P.S.  If you’d like more wisdom from the Tzu click here:  http://www.duhism.com/1216/shhhhh/,

and to give credit where credit is due, I found this picture here:  http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/articles/food-safety-communication/

Leave A Reply (7 comments So Far)

The comments are closed.


  1. Richard Curtis (2 comments)
    794 days ago

    John,
    Thanks for the thought provoking post.

    For me, the solution to your quandry would be in recognizing that there is only One Source for all things. The Tao, Infinite Mind, etc. and this includes thoughts/or thinking.

    If this premise of only One Source for all things which includes thoughts is true, then having two parallel thoughts would indicate I just cant or won’t make up my mind.

    I say this since we know that electro-mechanically there is only one thought (electro pulse) present in the brain at any given time. I am not equating brain with Mind here, but the brain expresses Mind, I think. The speed of the brain is so overwhelming we think we are thinking more than one thought simultaneously but we aren’t. Just fast.

    So”…gird up your mind (singular) and be sober…” Look in Romans for that one.

    Love and Light,

    richard

    akd ezduzit777 on twitter


  2. John Crewdson (479 comments)
    792 days ago

    Richard,

    OK, Ok, you got me. Sometimes it’s just flat out more fun to play the devil’s advocate with yourself. I think it makes it more interesting for readers who don’t necessarily agree with the concept of the Infinite Mind, and may dismiss it out of hand. So now you’ve gone and done it; you’ve gotten me to agree with you. Now none of those folks are going to read any further. Maybe that isn’t such a bad thing after all. ;-)

    John


  3. Al Simon (8 comments)
    792 days ago

    Hi John -

    What a coincidence! Exactly seven years ago this month, the magazine “Qi: The Journal of Traditional Eastern Health & Fitness” published an article I wrote about this topic, in their Winter 2002/2003 issue.

    The article explored how to “discuss” Tai Chi topics. While you mention “vocabulary” as creating the difficulties, I instead pointed to “semantics” as causing the problem. I showed how using the pioneering work of semanticists Alfred Korzybski and D. David Bourland, Jr. resolves a lot of the conflicts inherent in discussing Tai Chi, or indeed discussing any topic.

    At the end of the article, I related how their work reinforced the most fundamental principle of Taoism, found in the first line of Lao Tzu: “The road we talk about isn’t the same road we walk on!”

    I include the article in my advanced training course, but I’ve pulled it out of there and posted an easy-print copy that your readers can get to. I hope it’s OK if I post the link here:
    http://www.cloudwater.com/articles/TrueNatureTaijiquan.pdf

    I hope you and your readers enjoy the article.

    Best wishes,
    Al


  4. John Crewdson (479 comments)
    792 days ago

    Al,

    That’s very interesting. Of course you can link to an article here. I look forward to reading it myself.

    Thanks for sharing it,
    John


  5. Al Simon (8 comments)
    792 days ago

    You’re welcome, John, and thank you for the great blog posts.

    Best wishes,
    Al


  6. nwfighting (1 comments)
    789 days ago

    Thanks for the excellent blog. Mentally the principles from Tai Chi of redirecting force prove invaluable in everyday life. Many find that any debate they enter into becomes a game of psychological push-hands (a tai chi exercise where one learns to counter an opponents force and defeat them without having to directly overpower them). With practice one develops the ability to maintain a calm center regardless of circumstance. Spiritually Tai Chi practice cultivates ones energy. It can be a key piece of an internal arts practice to elevate your spirit; which is to say, gaining greater clarity and awareness, becoming less susceptible to petty distractions. With a clear mind one learns to put their full intent into their movements. Energy follows this intent extending the movements beyond their regular potential.


  7. John Crewdson (479 comments)
    788 days ago

    Nwfighting,

    I like the term “psychological push-hands”. Think I might start using that one. ;-)

    Thanks for the great comment,
    John